Opec yesterday (6/15/05) said we have a 10% surplus of fuel with fuel costs per barrel in the $50.00 range and this has never happened before.
Whats going on? Opex said "they haven't the answer.
Do you know the fuel companies today have the technology to manufacture more efficient fuels that would give better gas mileage up to 25%.
This fuel now is wasted in your converter. In addition the reformulated fuels have harmful additives like benzene, ethanol alcohol, benzene and coloring are the cause of varnishes, gums, hard carbon and resins to build up in your engine. This causes a very harmful drying effect causing wear on engine and the seals.
This build up makes your engine less efficient. Your loosing power and fuel efficiency, causing less MPG.
This all cost money wasted going out your tail pipe. The MaxImizer converts the fuel to a charged effect causing the fuel to react as a much higher refined fuel
Your saving grow and continue to grow.
A call from a customer who purchased the MaxImizer in January 01, 2002 ordered another system
stating he increased his mileage 6 MPG in his Olds (I do not remember the year).
This figured out to $00.03 a mile savings and
after driving 5000 miles the MaxImizer paid for itself. From here on every mile he drives puts $00.03
in his pocket as profit on his investment.) Why didn't I think of that? My Lincoln has made me money
over so many years of having the MaxImizer installed. I went from 94 octane to 87 octane that is
about $00.10 a gallon plus say $.03 a mile for about 175,000 miles is a savings figured it out to
over $3000.00 having the MaxImizer installed.
EMail received from customers
The owners manual from the car above requires premium fuel. If your vehicle requires premium fuel the cost of the MaxImizer will pay for itself very quickly, you can buy the 85 / 87 octane, it will perform like 100 octane.
This was my favorite car, the one I first purchased the MaxImizer System for
over 20 years ago and earned about $3000.00 on my investment, remember I first purchased the MaxImizer retail. This 1979 Lincoln
hasn't had a tune up since shortly after installation when the carburetor was adjusted.
I now buy 87 octane fuel, (before I bought 94 octane) go 7,000 miles per oil
change when it only uses about a pint of oil (oil never breaks down) many years of using the MaxImizer paid for the system over many times.
More power, cold winter starts
quickly, and people are amazed at how smooth the engine runs. Many have stated,
"that is proof enough for me, I want one".
If you have an automatic transmission you can add the AT to your system that will keep and/or keep your transmission in like new condition and will restore a slipping transmission back to normal operation providing the clutches are not worn out and only carboned up. The carbon will be dissolved from the clutches. Keeps the oil from breaking down.
I have passed the emission test
with no pollution devices installed on the car.
The Auto MaxImizer System reduces emissions
in vehicles by burning the carbon monoxide in the
combustion chamber. Many cases reported in the
80 to 100% range. This converts into more power
and improved gas mileage that range from 10 - 35%.
Why waste this fuel by burning it in your converter
as the government wants you to do? Users say
their cars run cooler, engines last longer, and
there is a noticeable improvement in performance.
If your area requires emission testing the MaxImizer
will benefit your car by passing this test without costly added
repairs.
This helps solve environmental problems as
one user of television film fame wrote -
"On my 1995 Blazer it reduced the carbon monoxide
from 3000 parts per million to 100 parts per million.
Nitrousoxide and hydrocarbons were reduced
to an almost immeasurable degree. At the
same time, my mileage increased almost
15%. If all cars were equipped with a MaxImizer,
our children could breathe clean air."
Columbia, SA just required all automobiles have the MaxImizer
installed on their automobiles to curb the high pollution they
are troubled with. A sticker must be present on the windshield
or they will be fined and restrict that vehicle from being driven.
A customer concerned about the amount of scam on the internet and asked for additional
information of which he thought it would be a good idea to put the information
I sent him on this page.
There is a great deal of scam on the Internet with magnetic fuel increasers that
do not work at all or give such small increases that they are considered worthless. Just drop an EMail for more information
Prior to finding this company I used cow magnets on my Lincoln's fuel line. I knew
enough about the principal to place the North pole towards the fuel flowing toward
the injectors or carburetors and have it exit by the South pole.
It was difficult to tell if it works
much but I left them there until I bought this system. The North South pole seems to
neutralize the effects.
In 1982 Dr. Peter Kulish invented the mono-pole magnet and obtained a utility patend, note that under U.S.C. 35, subsection 101, under this patend it
must be proven scientifically operable
and correct before issuance.
Design patents are not subject to the above PTO ruling.
Having just a North Pole or South Pole produces enough of increased power that
its effect produces the tremendous increased results.
When a fluid or gas passes
an external magnetic field, the magnetic moment that occurs re-arranges its electrons
on a molecular and atomic level. Because it is fluid, the electrons remain in their higher
potential spin energy. This is known as the magnetic Fluid Memory Effect. South Pole
induces a positive charge to fluids passing through this mono-pole effect conversely the
North Pole produces a negative effect. Simplified gasoline molecule octane (8 carbon
atoms = octane C8 H18.
H H H H H H H H
H-C C C C C C C C-H
H H H H H H H H
(note: actual gasoline is branched rather than straight)
In the normal state, hydrocarbon fuel and air both are neutral molecules with
negative potential. When they come together in the combustion chamber they
molecularly repel, resulting in inefficient burn.
This creates emissions which is,
actually, unburned fuel.. After going past our system the now positively charged
fuel moleculary attracts the negative charged air (we place the negative magnet
over the air intake) for better oxidation. This results in more complete burn, thereby
saving fuel and reducing emissions. A Backplate comes with each magnet that causes the magnetic force to bounce back from the plate to the magnet going back and forth all the time they remain installed. This gives a very strong magnetic force into the fluids and air.
We have a California State approval number
and the Government is using on some vehicles (El Paso Border Patrol). Following
are tests done around the world done after obtaining the patent. In recent years our
test have not been needed as our reputation has become well known. My brother in
law has the magnets on his 86 Toyota Camry with around 8 miles per gallon increase.
He drives mostly in the city and does very little traveling.
>
My Lincoln gave me 9 to 12 MPG
on 94 octane, now I use 87 octane and get 16 to 19 MPG.
Following you see two emails of two different dates from the same person, Read what he had to say about the Fabulous MaxImizer;
From: “Jerry Mieczkowski”
To: tomwflye@penn.com
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2001 11:30 AM
Subject: Maximizer
I purchased one of your Maximizers on 5/2/01 after a long phone conversation with you. I installed it on my wife's 1999 Chevy Blazer without her knowing it. She is a real skeptic. She drove it for over a month before I got busted with the credit card statement. But in the mean time I kept asking her how the mileage was doing? She keeps a log because she drives 65 miles one way. She said it kept creeping up, went from 19mpg to over 20mpg then to over 21mpg. Now after 2 months it has been close to 23mpg and I expect it to get to about 25mpg. I liked it so well I ordered another one for my Chevy S10 4cyl.
I believe in magnets, because I put one on my main water line to my house over a year ago. My hot water lines kept plugging up with lime build up and I had to remove the lines from my faucets about every six months to clean them out so I could get sufficient hot water. Also I would drain my hot water heater and get a large amount of lime chunks on my driveway every time. I just replaced most all of my faucets and showerheads and the lines were completely clean.
I drained the hot water heater and no visible lime was found. This makes me very happy.
Thanks
Jerry Mieczkowski
Normal Illinois
From: “Jerry Mieczkowski”
To: tomwflye@penn.com
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 7:01 PM
Subject: Magnets
Hi Tom,
How much is the magnet system for the home water system? I have two for both my vehicles and they are great!
Jerry Mieczkowski
Normal IL
MaxImizer Efficiency/Emission Reduction Tests
All tests performed under Federal EPA Code 40 CFR, Sec. 51.351
These are before & after results with a Magnetizer installed showing reduced emissions.
Emissions = Unburned Fuel / Reduction of Emissions = Fuel Savings
| Make/Model |
HC Before |
HC After |
% HC Decrease |
CO Before |
CO After |
% CO Decrease |
| Chevy 307 V8 |
774 |
580 |
25% |
.06 |
.00 |
100% |
| Chevy 400,V8 |
141 |
37 |
73% |
1.78 |
021 |
88% |
| Chevy 2.8L,V6 |
46 |
11 |
76% |
.31 |
.00 |
100% |
| 85 Pontiac 6000 |
227 |
42 |
81% |
.33 |
.04 |
89% |
| Escort 4 Cyl.1 |
259 |
54 |
79% |
5.9 |
.25 |
96% |
| Ford Pick-Up V8 |
158 |
16 |
90% |
.21 |
.8 |
57% |
| NissanV6 3.0 4x4 |
130 |
30 |
77% |
1.7 |
.00 |
100% |
| 84 Chevy V8 |
12 |
0 |
100% |
.00 |
.00 |
N/A |
| 83 Chevy V6,(C)2 |
72 |
0 |
100% |
.34 |
.01 |
98% |
| 78 Olds 280 V6(C)2 |
48 |
65 |
81% |
.04 |
.01 |
75% |
| 82 Linc 302V8 (C)2 |
13 |
4 |
69% |
.05 |
.00 |
100% |
| 88 Ford 2.3L(F.I.)2 |
193 |
20 |
90% |
.80 |
.01 |
98% |
| 86 Dodge318V8(C)2 |
125 |
15 |
88% |
1.24 |
.02 |
98% |
| 87 Jeep 4.0L V62 |
18 |
8 |
55% |
.09 |
.04 |
55% |
| 75Buick350V8(C)2,3 |
128 |
95 |
26% |
4.21 |
4.04 |
4% |
| 86 Pontiac |
125 |
0 |
100% |
.04 |
.00 |
100% |
| Chevy Van V8 |
190 |
125 |
65% |
1.8 |
.30 |
81% |
| 88 Jeep |
38 |
7 |
81% |
16 |
.05 |
68% |
| Hyundai 4 Cyl.4 |
18 |
14 |
22% |
5.69 |
.02 |
99% |
| 91 Suzuki, 4 cyl.a |
170 |
100 |
41% |
1.6 |
.15 |
91% |
| Nissan Sxa |
70 |
90 |
+29 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
33% |
| 88 Volksw, 4 cyl.a |
320 |
270 |
15% |
6.2 |
3.6 |
42% |
| 86 Mitsubishi,4 cyla |
390 |
330 |
15% |
3.8 |
2.8 |
26% |
| 76 Chevy, 4 cyl.a |
320 |
180 |
44% |
3.6 |
1.0 |
72% |
| 87 Oldsmobile |
63 |
0 |
100% |
.06 |
.00 |
100% |
| 69 Corvette 350CID |
383 |
197 |
48% |
7.85 |
1.98 |
74% |
| 90 Olds 6 Cyl. |
60 |
48 |
20% |
.32 |
.23 |
31% |
| 90 ChevyLuv1600cc |
3.96 |
3.20 |
19.2 |
57.3 |
53.7 |
6.3% |
| 90 Chevy 350 (C) |
79 |
21 |
73% |
.14 |
.01 |
93% |
| 84 BMW 6 Cyl. |
64 |
39 |
39% |
.60 |
.05 |
90% |
| 93 Proton 1.5L |
130 |
100 |
23% |
2.0 |
1.4 |
30% |
| 94 Chevy Suburban |
56.0 |
6.0 |
89% |
.10 |
.00 |
100% |
(C) = Carburetor (F.I.) = Fuel Injection * = Accuracy within +/- .04
a = Guatemalan Report b = Argentinean Test c = Malaysian OEM Test
1 = Boston Gas Company 2 = On file with Magnexx Corporation
3 = Buick has heavy deposits, must go through stabilization period to attain full results.
4 = Stabilization period only, final not available.
Auto MaxImizer Fuel Energizer Certified Fuel Savings & Horsepower Increase
Tests
VTEC Laboratories - test - 26% drop in fuel consumption.
Preliminary Emissions test by Institute of Aeronautics (Poland) - 40% CO reduction, 20%
HC reduction.
RV Power Group - Gulf Stream high rise from 5.34 mpg to 8.08 mpg.
Bacon Equipment Company - 33% horsepower increase (farm tractor).
J.P. Bethlehem, PA - 12.5% faster ¼ mile race time (Corvette).
Manner Automotive Tech - 10% horsepower increase (Chevrolet).
Penske Racing - 4.8% average horsepower gain (full race engine).
Tom McCall, Petrochemical Engineer - de-carbonizing of fuel injection system and engine.
Chile EPA - 18% Fuel savings.
Chinese test on early prototype Auto Fuel Energizer - 7-10% Fuel savings.
Tomei Industrial Furnace, Taiwan - reduction of 11.7% of heavy oil used.
Northern California Diagnostic Laboratories reported a 5% increase in
horsepower during testing.
US Border Patrol Test (8/10/95) - 94 Chevy Suburban 27.0%, 90 Ford Bronco, 29.8%, 91
Nissan 4 x 4, 10.3%, 86 6.9L Diesel, 50.8%.
Electrometal Ltd. (7/31/95) - Genset (Motor/Generator) - Saved 25% on Diesel Fuel.
Wheels Ltd. (11/04/95) - Two Ambassador's Vehicles, increased mileage of rental cars by
17.46% and 18.0% respectively.
City of Berkeley CA - Fuel Economy change: 95 Ford Crown V8, 14.13%, 95 Ford Crown
V8 (2.46%), 90 E-350 Ford Van V8, 7.06%.
